NATIONAL UNIVERSITIES COMMISSION
REPORT ON ACCREDITATION OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES
IN NIGERIAN UNIVERSITIES
A. SUMMARY OF PANEL’S REPORT
DATE OF VISITATION:
24-28 November, 2024
INSTITUTION:
Lead City University, Ibadan
DISCIPLINE:
Medicine
PROGRAMME:
Dentistry
PROGRAMME SCORE:
71.90%
ACCREDITATION STATUS:
INTERIM
DEFICIENCIES |
REMEDIES |
1. Penalties for examination malpractices, dress code and 2. Core academic staff for Clinical Dentistry are inadequate. 3. Staff mix by rank of 18.9:32.4:48.6 meets BMAS guideline in only one 4. 32.4% of the academic staff do not possess a Ph.D. nor fellowship. 5. 78.4% and 28% of the academic and non-teaching staff respectively 6. Academic staff offices are not well furnished. 7. The Phantom Head Laboratory does not have operators’ stools, 8. The Dental Prosthetic Technique Laboratory lack face- bows and 9. There was no Oral Biology Laboratory (Oral Pathology 10. The fire extinguisher had expired and the buckets of sand were 11. Physical library journals are inadequate in number and currency. 12. The slow internet connectivity impedes access to e-books and e-
|
1. The University should ensure that the rules and regulations governing 2. The University should ensure that adequate core Clinical Dental 3. The University should ensure a staff mix by rank of 20:35:45 in line 4. The University should ensure that all academic staff possess a Ph.D. 5. The University should ensure that all academic and non-teaching 6. All academic staff offices should be well furnished for the 7. The University should ensure that the Phantom Head Laboratory is 8. The University should ensure that the Dental Prosthetic Technique 9. Standard Oral Biology Laboratory should be provided for the 10. Adequate safety measures should be put in place for the 11. More current journals should be procured for the programme. 12. The University should ensure that stable and steady internet
|
The total score for the programme is 71.90%. It scored 29 (82.86%) in Academic Matters, 23 (65.71%) in Staffing, 21 (77.78%) in Physical Facilities, 10 (55.56%) in Library. The programme scored 2 (66.67%) in Funding, 2 (66.67%) in Research and Collaborations and 0 (0.00%) in Employers’ Rating. Based on the fact that the programme scored less than 70% in any of the four core components (Academic Matters, Staffing, Physical Facilities and Library), the Panel recommended INTERIM accreditation status for the Programme.
B. APPROVAL BY THE COMMISSION
Based on further analysis of the report, the Commission upholds the recommendation of INTERIM accreditation status for the Programme